Bce vs WPP

BCE · WPP

In fiscal year 2025 WPP reported $17.9B in revenue against Bce's $17.5B, 1.02× as much.

Bce vs WPP
MeasureBCEWPPGap
Revenue$17.5B$17.9B×1.02
Cost of revenue$5.5B$15.0B×2.72
Net income$4.7B−$284M—
EPS (diluted)4.86−0.26—
Shareholders' equity$16.8B$3.4B×4.92
Long-term debt$25.5B$5.5B×4.60
Net margin26.6%−1.6%—
Operating cash flow$5.0B$955M×5.24
Capital expenditure$2.6B$120M×22.07
Free cash flow$2.4B$835M×2.82
Income tax expense$854M$400M×2.14
Share buybacks$155M$128M×1.21

The larger of the two figures is in bold. Larger is not automatically better: on debt, cost and tax a bigger number is simply a bigger number. This site reports the figures and leaves the judgement to you.

Revenue, year by year

Bce · 2017–2025

$17.6B2017$18.1B2018$17.9B2019$17.1B2020$18.7B2021$18.6B2022$18.3B2023$17.8B2024$17.5B2025

WPP · 2015–2025

$18.7B2015$20.1B2016$16.9B2017$17.4B2018$16.9B2019$15.4B2020$17.6B2021$17.8B2022$18.5B2023$18.8B2024$17.9B2025

Every row links to its own SEC filing · Fiscal year 2025 · Data as of September 25, 2026

Cite this page

Ready-made references for the figures on this page, as published on September 25, 2026.

Wikipedia

{{cite web |title=Bce vs WPP |url=https://companiesranked.com/en/compare/bce-vs-wpp |website=CompaniesRanked |date=2026-09-25 |language=en}}

APA 7

CompaniesRanked. (September 25, 2026). Bce vs WPP. CompaniesRanked. https://companiesranked.com/en/compare/bce-vs-wpp

BibTeX

@misc{companiesranked-en-compare-bce-vs-wpp-2026,
  author       = {{CompaniesRanked}},
  title        = {{Bce vs WPP}},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://companiesranked.com/en/compare/bce-vs-wpp}},
  note         = {Compiled from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings; data as of 2026-09-25},
  urldate      = {2026-09-25}
}

The figures are rebuilt with every data refresh, so the reference carries the publication date. Add your own access date if your style requires one.

← Bce · WPP →