Records — what a single ranking cannot show
A ranking sorts one measure in one year. These three tables ask what a ranking cannot: how long a company has been growing, how far it sits from its own best year, and which companies earn the same revenue from completely different machines.
Longest unbroken growth
Companies whose revenue has risen every single year up to the latest filed year, without one down year in between. Only companies above $1.0B in revenue, and only runs of 3 years or more.
| Company | Years | Revenue now | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Astrana HealthIndustrials | ≥ 142011 → 2025 | $3.2B | 622.56× |
| ServiceNowTechnology | ≥ 142011 → 2025 | $13.3B | 143.33× |
| Wix.comTechnology | ≥ 142011 → 2025 | $2.0B | 81.02× |
| Palo Alto NetworksTechnology | ≥ 142011 → 2025 | $9.2B | 77.75× |
| WorkdayTechnology | ≥ 142011 → 2025 | $9.6B | 71.06× |
| IncyteHealthcare | ≥ 142011 → 2025 | $5.1B | 54.43× |
| Veeva SystemsTechnology | ≥ 142011 → 2025 | $3.2B | 52.16× |
| CenteneHealthcare | ≥ 142011 → 2025 | $195B | 37.37× |
| SalesforceTechnology | ≥ 142011 → 2025 | $41.5B | 18.32× |
| Jazz PharmaceuticalsHealthcare | ≥ 142011 → 2025 | $4.3B | 15.67× |
A run marked “at least” reaches the start of the fifteen-year window: it began earlier than the history we hold, so its true length is unknown.
Still below their own peak
Companies whose best revenue year is at least 3 years behind them and which are still at 80% of it or less. The peak had to be above $5.0B, so this is about large companies that shrank, not small ones that wobbled.
| Company | Peak | Latest year | Share of peak |
|---|---|---|---|
| BlackberryTechnology | $18.4B2011 · ≥ 14 years ago | $549M | 3% |
| Murphy OilEnergy | $27.6B2011 · ≥ 14 years ago | $2.7B | 10% |
| Eastman KodakConsumer discretionary | $5.1B2011 · ≥ 14 years ago | $1.1B | 21% |
| CNX ResourcesEnergy | $6.1B2011 · ≥ 14 years ago | $2.2B | 37% |
| HPTechnology | $127B2011 · ≥ 14 years ago | $55.3B | 43% |
| International Business MachinesTechnology | $107B2011 · ≥ 14 years ago | $67.5B | 63% |
| PPLUtilities | $12.7B2011 · ≥ 14 years ago | $9.2B | 72% |
| Genworth FinancialFinancials | $9.9B2011 · ≥ 14 years ago | $7.3B | 74% |
| ChevronEnergy | $254B2011 · ≥ 14 years ago | $189B | 75% |
| American InternationalFinancials | $71.2B2012 · 13 years ago | $26.8B | 38% |
A ranking still shows these companies high up, because a ranking only shows this year. Where the figure sits inside the company's own history is a different question.
Same revenue, different machine
Pairs from different sectors whose revenue differs by less than 0.5%, but where one balance sheet is at least 5 times the other. The revenue is a coincidence; the gap between the balance sheets is the business model.
| Revenue | Larger balance sheet | Smaller balance sheet | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| $23.3B | Federal Home Loan Mortgageassets $3.50T | Learassets $14.8B | 235.64× |
| $18.5B | Corebridge Financialassets $414B | Global Partnersassets $3.9B | 107.39× |
| $29.0B | Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Maeassets $4.32T | Mercadolibreassets $42.7B | 101.19× |
| $19.5B | KKRassets $410B | Murphy USAassets $4.7B | 86.79× |
| $35.5B | Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaftassets $1.69T | CHSassets $20.7B | 81.57× |
| $11.7B | Equitable Holdingsassets $318B | Oscar Healthassets $6.3B | 50.27× |
| $26.0B | Bank of Montrealassets $1.06T | Carmaxassets $25.6B | 41.66× |
| $12.6B | Intercontinental Exchangeassets $137B | Chewyassets $3.4B | 40.66× |
The revenue shown is the larger of the two; the difference between them is under the threshold above. Each company appears at most once, and the pairs with the widest gap are chosen first. There is no comparison page for these pairs: comparison pages are built for companies in the same sector, and these are by definition not.
How these tables are built
Nothing here is hand-picked. Each table is a rule applied to the whole catalogue, so it rebuilds itself every time the data is refreshed and a company enters or leaves on its own numbers. The rule and its thresholds are stated above each table, and the pool is the same one the revenue ranking uses — so companies that file a gross transaction value instead of revenue, or only part of their income, are left out here for the reason they are left out there.
The history reaches back fifteen years and no further. A run that began before then is shown as “at least” that many years and marked; saying otherwise would claim something the filings in hand do not show.
What the window hides
All three tables read a company's own revenue series, so they inherit its limits. A company that changed the XBRL tag it reports revenue under can have years missing from the series, because a figure that is not comparable with the rest is dropped rather than drawn; a gap like that ends a run at the gap, which is the cautious answer rather than the flattering one.
Fiscal years are not calendar years. Two companies in the same row of the last table may be twelve months apart in what they are reporting, and a company that moved its year-end will have an odd-looking step in its series. The year shown is the fiscal year the filing itself names.